Water boarding Democrat Style                      
    By Mike Moseley

      A great passion surfaces with the debate of water boarding.  Most Democratic leaders say publicly that water boarding is torture and should not be used.  Most Republicans say water boarding is not torture and has been effective in saving lives all over the world.  As with every issue relating to the War on Terror, the Democrats are playing politics with the safety and security of Americans both at home and on the battlefield.  The politicized  list of issues is stunning. The most important issues are Democrats support of the New York Times release of information about the money transfer and the terror surveillance program.  Then there was Democratic Senator Harry Reid’s statement that the war in Iraq “is lost”.  Also, the liberal Democratic leadership working hand in hand with Moveon.org as they attacked  America’s finest general David Petraeus  insulting every man that has worn a uniform.  Rep John Murtha followed this with calling the Haditha Marines “cold blooded killers” on national television.  Since the election, the Democrats have attempted to force the Commander and Chief to bring troops home despite the great success of the military surge.  However, the issue of water boarding  is somewhat different in that  American cities will face a moment in time when a terrorist holds the key to saving millions of lives.
    
    Will Democratic leaders protect American citizens in major cities?   Will they act to save the lives of people in New York, Washington D.C.,  Los Angeles, and Chicago or let the bombs go off?   Clearly,  the Democrats will not water board. They have taken the position assuring America that the terrorists bombs will explode as they fatten the terrorist with food and drink.  Just like on 9-11, all of the Muslim world will celebrate Allah’s great day.  The Democrats will explain to the American population that they did not want to make the terrorists uncomfortable.  When this scenario plays out, the Democrat play book will include blaming President Bush and quite possibly  Vice President Cheney.

      Clearly, a terrorist planning an attack on American soil must to be jumping up and down with excitement and great joy.  Not one of the Democrats have said they will protect America with every tool possible.  Can you imagine the terrorist’s joy when they found out about the wire transfer program, the terror surveillance program, Democratic leadership’s  call for defeat, etc.         

    As John Murtha (D.PA) has stated about our soldiers on the battlefield, “they cracked under the pressure.”  Clearly, the only people that have “cracked under the pressure” are the Democrats Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Dick Durbin, and John Murtha .  The Democratic leadership is as dangerous to the American population as radical Islam is to the world.  Will the terrorists enjoy a time of great victory with a Democratic victory in the next election?  Will the war on terror continue until radical Islam wins?  Or will the American people demand that Democratic leadership protect it’s citizens against an enemy that wants to butcher their children.  War is an ugly thing, and no place for a  politically correct liberal.  If Hillary Clinton or Barak Obama is elected, will either have credibility with the troops?  If the soldiers on the battlefield are killed because information wasn’t extracted by water boarding, what will happen?  If there is a terrorist attack in New York City, will it be because the terrorist wasn’t water boarded?  

    From an underground bunker it’s easy to give terrorists rights.  I would suspect that citizens of New York City have a much different view.

Mike Moseley