Posted by
MikeMoseley on Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:12:51 PM
Some questions to consider about change 1-16-08
By Mike Moseley
The new word for today and the election season is change. Mr
Obama used the word liberally in each of the recent debates. Not to be
outdone, Mrs. Clinton used the word as a fix all. Mr Edwards is also
expressed that he would be the leader in change. The Republicans
expressed their willingness to change. Mr McCain says that Washington
needs to change and he is the one to do it . Mr. Huckebee says that he
changed Arkansas and he could change Washington. Mr Romney says that he
has been successful at change in the private sector and in public
office. So you get the picture. The American people are tired of
Washington politics. Most people think of change as a good thing for
our broken government. Just a couple questions to consider.
Is the answer for America found in border security and wall being
built? Or is the answer amnesty for illegals and open borders?
Is the answer for America found in the continued spending of $335
billion dollars a year on benefits, welfare, medical care for non
citizens? Or is the answer, use the taxpayers money to rebuild social
security for the baby boomers and generations to come?
Will America’s taxpayers foot the bill for massive spending increases
to expanded the S-chip program to cover 12-20 million illegals and
their families ( possibly up to 50 million). Or will America demand
Washington use tax money on legal citizens?
Does Mexico’s welfare state and criminal element make us better as a
nation? Or can America’s citizens afford the cost that is associated
with a third world country’s welfare and criminal state?
If American leadership extends amnesty to 50 million people, 12-20
million illegals plus family members, do the tax payers have the
financial ability to pay for a massive tax increase? Or will seniors
have to take a benefits cut instead? Or will the massive spending
program bankrupt states and the U.S. government?
Will America put a end to the Mexican military invasion of the
sovereign United States? Or will we allow the Mexican military to
disregard the southern borders as they bring illegals and drugs into
our country?
Is America better off because of cheap labor undercutting decent wages? Or would we be better off with more high paying jobs?
Do American men in uniform perform any better with a divided government
that offers terrorist more respect and rights than our soldiers get? Or
would America be better if the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan had a
supporting voice of victory from both sides of government?
If the new administration changes the terror surveillance protocols will American cities be safer or be put in more danger?
Is America better because we buy oil from radical Islamic nations? Or
would America be better off building refineries, opening domestic oil
fields and growing an industry that provides good jobs with benefits?
Is America better off purchasing domestic and military goods from
China? Or would Americans be safer and more secure with the USA label?
Are Americans better off with government run health care? Or better
paying jobs that would afford each individual the rights of choice?
Will America’s top corporate businesses stay in the United States when
taxes are raised? Or will the top businesses and their employees go
offshore like others have?
Will the United States of America continue to be a sovereign nation?
Or will our borders be given away by internationalists in both parties
of government?
America does need change and needs it now. Our elected leaders in
government have made many mistakes and looks like they will continue in
the same direction. Their choices could mean the end of America as we
know it. If we have learned anything of recent history, we have
learned that Washington can not be trusted with policies such as the
amnesty fiasco. As voters consider the issues and the possible
solutions of each party, we all know that change can also be bad.
Clearly, Washington will need the voters guidance after the election.
If I could make a change, it would be cutting government because expanding government has been an absolute failure.